The Difference Between Sissy And Bitzer Essay -- essays research paper

     "Give me your definition of a horse," (Pg 3) says the eminently practical Mr. Thomas Gradgrind of Charles Dickens unforgettable novel, Hard Times. Can anybody sincerely define a horse? Cecilia Jupe, also known as emasculate, was uneffective to answer this question because she was, well, normal. Bitzer, the boy brought up in Coketown, the city of facts, answered, "Quadruped. Graminivorous. xl teeth, namely, twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive..." (Pg. 4). Clearly the contrast between pansy and Bitzer can be seen. The differences between Bitzer and faggot are shown non still in their definitions of a horse, scarce also in their strong-arm appearance, constitution, background, and the diverse philosophies that they each represent fact and fancy.     From the very root, Dickens had made it earn to the reader that Sissy represents fancy and Bitzer represents facts. He uses the two characters i n many an separate(prenominal) ways to portray the differences between fact and fancy. One way of doing this is describing Sissy and Bitzers physical appearance. Dickens has a tendency to make his characters physical appearance reflect their personalities. This is true for both Sissy and Bitzer. Sissy is exposit as vibrant and full of dark, rich colors. She glows with passion and kindness. Bitzer, on the other hand, is described as a very pale boy. He seems cold and emotionless, with light colored eyes and light colored hair. While Sissy seems to have an aura of goodness, Bitzer does not. He is emotionless. Even in the setting of a classroom, the differences in appearance between Sissy and Bitzer are apparent, for Sissy, being at the corner of a row on the sunny side, came in for the beginning of a sunray, of which Bitzer, being at the corner of a row on the other side, a few rows in advance, caught the end. Sissy seemed to receive a deeper and more lustrous colour from the sun when it sh peerless upon her, while the same sunbeam seem to draw out of him (Bitzer) what little colour he ever so possessed (Pg. 3-4). The differences between Sissy and Bitzer are so evident that one must have been able to tell which philosophies that they each stand for.      end-to-end the course of the novel, Sissy and Bitzers actions help to describe what kind of personality they each have, which are a... ...s logical to them. Bitzer, however, represents the doctrine of facts and further facts. His actions, appearance, and training at Mr. McChoakumchilds school show what a person becomes when they follow that philosophy. He had become cold and hard, with not a single thought for anyone but his self-interest. Dickens uses these two characters to show the differences between the two philosophies and the consequences that following these philosophies may have.     Through Bitzer and Sissy, the two different philosophies that each repre sent can be clearly seen fact versus fancy. Bitzer has become a selfish person who does not care for anyone but himself. Sissy was the emotional center of the book because she was, practically, the only one that had real emotions from the very beginning. It can be distinguished which philosophy Dickens agrees with fancy. He makes fact seem dull and dead, while do fancy seem colorful and full of life. Sissy is the kind of person that everyone would love, and Bitzer is someone that everybody would hate. Unmistakably, it is easy to tell which philosophy one would prefer. Maybe Bitzer ought to proceeds a couple of lessons from Sissy.